CategoriesNews & Blog

The Case for Select-Service Hotels: Why Smart CRE Capital Is Moving Into This Sector

In commercial real estate, the search for yield rarely comes with simplicity. Most asset classes that deliver strong returns also carry complexity, including layered operating risk, volatile demand cycles, or structural headwinds that require constant navigation. Select-service hotels are a notable exception. In today’s environment, that exception matters.

For investors and operators who understand hospitality real estate, select-service and extended-stay hotels have quietly become one of the most compelling allocations in the CRE landscape. The numbers back it up. The fundamentals are sound. And the opportunity window, shaped by limited new supply, evolving traveler behavior, and a maturing lending environment, is one that sophisticated capital is actively seeking to capture.

Record Performance in a Challenging Market

The headline stat is hard to ignore: according to JLL’s U.S. Select-Service and Extended-Stay Hotel Outlook 2025, RevPAR (revenue per available room) in this sector reached a record $78 in 2024, 14% above 2019 pre-pandemic levels. Demand surged by 232,000 room nights year-over-year, nearly completing a full recovery from the COVID disruption.

This isn’t a one-cycle story. It’s a structural shift.

What drove it? The convergence of the select-service and extended-stay categories into a unified market. Properties in this space now blend amenities, in-room kitchenettes, flexible workspaces, and self-service food and beverage options to appeal to a broader, more diverse traveler base. Business travelers, remote workers, and leisure guests are all finding value in the same product. That demand for diversity is exactly what CRE investors look for when underwriting long-term asset performance.

The Margin Story Is the Real Headline

For anyone deploying capital into operating real estate, margins are the metric that separates good assets from great ones. This is where select service truly distinguishes itself from the broader hospitality landscape.

Gross Operating Profit (GOP) margins in select-service properties averaged about 26%, compared with just 15% for full-service hotels — a gap driven by leaner labor costs and the absence of food and beverage operations, which are notoriously difficult to run profitably. Full-service hotels carry complex staffing structures, multiple food and beverage outlets, and conference infrastructure that consumes revenue as quickly as it generates it. Select service strips away that complexity without sacrificing the guest experience.

The result is a cleaner, more durable income stream. EBITDA per available room (EBITDA/PAR) in the select-service sector has grown at a 23% CAGR since 2020, while CPI averaged about 5% over the same period, meaning this asset class has meaningfully outpaced inflation in profitability growth. For a CRE investor focused on real returns, that spread is significant.

Investment Volume and Liquidity

Institutional conviction in this sector is no longer speculative; it’s measurable. Since 2021, select-service and extended-stay hotels have generated $62.6 billion in investment liquidity, accounting for nearly 50% of all U.S. hotel transaction volume, according to JLL.

This level of capital concentration is meaningful for two reasons. First, it signals consensus among sophisticated investors on the sector’s risk-adjusted return profile. Second, it creates liquidity, the ability to transact, refinance, and exit, which many CRE niches lack.

JLL also notes that this sector exhibits the lowest yield volatility over the past 16 years among major property categories. In a macro environment defined by rate uncertainty, inflationary pressure, and shifting demand patterns across office and retail, low volatility is not a minor advantage. It is an advantage.

Supply Discipline Creating Pricing Power

One of the more overlooked tailwinds in this sector is the supply picture. New select-service and extended-stay construction has slowed to below 2.6% of existing inventory, below its historical average. Meanwhile, the number of brands in the sector has grown from 184 in 2000 to 214 today, representing 74% of the sector’s total room supply, according to JLL. Marriott, Hilton, and IHG are all expanding aggressively through franchise-driven growth, conversions, and targeted acquisitions.

The implication for asset values is straightforward: when demand is growing and new supply is constrained, existing assets gain pricing power. ADR growth and occupancy stability follow. Investors entering this space now are capturing assets before that compression fully plays out.

What LRE & Co Sees in This Sector

From a commercial real estate perspective, the select-service hotel thesis aligns with what we seek across asset classes: durable cash flows, margin resilience, supply constraints, and a broadening base of institutional capital that provides exit liquidity.

The lending landscape is also evolving favorably. While banks remain dominant in this space, JLL notes increased participation by insurance companies, CMBS lenders, and investor-driven debt sources, a diversification that reduces refinancing risk and offers greater structuring flexibility for acquisitions and development.

The broader U.S. hospitality real estate market is expected to grow from approximately $1.03 trillion in 2025 to $1.39 trillion by 2031, at a 5.1% CAGR, according to Mordor Intelligence. Within that growth trajectory, select-service is positioned to capture a disproportionate share, driven by its operational model, adaptability to evolving traveler preferences, and the simple fact that it delivers better returns with less complexity.

The Bottom Line

In commercial real estate, the assets that compound quietly, deliver consistent yields, attract durable institutional capital, and remain relevant across economic cycles tend to reward patient, disciplined investors most.

Select-service hotels have earned that designation. The data for 2024 and early 2025 isn’t a short-term spike; it reflects a sector that has matured, evolved, and positioned itself as one of the more defensible income plays in the current CRE environment.

At LRE & Co, we continue to evaluate select-service opportunities with the rigor this asset class deserves and with the conviction that the fundamentals support them

CategoriesNews & Blog

The QSR Tenant You Want in Your Strip Center: What Brokers Need to Know About Fast Food Credit

Understanding NNN lease structures, corporate vs. franchisee guarantees, and why QSR anchors drive 1031 demand

Not All QSR Tenants Are Created Equal

When a broker brings a strip center deal to market, one of the first questions sophisticated investors ask is: Who are the tenants, and what’s their credit quality? In the QSR space, that answer can mean the difference between a cap-rate compression story and a credit-risk discount.

Understanding the difference between a corporate-guaranteed lease and a franchisee-backed lease is crucial knowledge for any broker advising investors in today’s market.

Corporate vs. Franchisee: The Credit Distinction That Matters

A QSR location backed by a corporate guarantee from the parent company, such as McDonald’s Corporation or Yum! Brands, essentially functions as a bond-like investment. The credit is solid, the covenants are strict, and the cap rates reflect this. These assets trade at premium prices because the investment risk is very low.

Franchisee-guaranteed leases are a different matter. A franchisee with 200 units and many years of operation may still be a strong credit, but investors will evaluate it differently. Brokers need to help clients understand the distinction and price accordingly. A single-unit franchisee guarantee on a 15-year NNN lease isn’t the same as a corporate guarantee, even if the rent checks look identical.

Why QSR Drives 1031 Exchange Demand

The 1031 exchange buyer pool is among the most active in commercial real estate, and QSR NNN assets are among its top choices. The reasons are simple: passive income, long lease terms, and strong residual value even after the lease ends.

For brokers, this means QSR assets, particularly those with 10 or more years of lease term remaining, tend to trade quickly and at competitive cap rates. Listing a well-located, credit-tenanted QSR asset engages a motivated national buyer pool from day one.

What to Look for When Advising Seller Clients

If you’re representing an owner of a QSR-anchored strip center, the key value drivers are clear: remaining lease term, rent escalation schedule, tenant credit quality, and location relative to growth corridors. In Idaho markets, the growth story adds another layer of upside that institutional buyers increasingly recognize.

Brokers who understand the nuances of QSR credit and lease structures are better equipped to price deals accurately, attract suitable buyers, and close transactions efficiently.

Ready to explore opportunities in Idaho’s commercial real estate market? Contact LRE & Co today.

 

CategoriesNews & Blog

Why I Always Walk the Site Before I Read the Report

The Report Is Always a Backward-Looking Document

I want to say something that I know will make some of my colleagues in commercial real estate uncomfortable: demographic reports, traffic studies, and broker packages are useful, but they always describe the market that existed when the data was collected — not the market that exists when your project opens, and certainly not the market that will exist when your lease matures.

I don’t say this to dismiss the analytical tools that inform sound development decisions. I use them. My team relies on them. Rigorous quantitative analysis is non-negotiable in any development I’m involved in. But I have learned, through deals that worked and deals that didn’t, that the most important information about a market is almost never in the report. It’s in the market itself, waiting for someone willing to go look.

What You See That the Data Cannot Show You

When I walk a site, I’m looking for specific things no demographic report can capture. The first is the quality of the surrounding development. Not whether development is occurring (the data tells you that), but what kind. New residential construction that attracts young families with children signals a different market than apartment development that attracts transient renters. The physical quality of the housing stock, the presence of parks and schools, and the condition of the adjacent commercial development tell you something about the community’s trajectory that a traffic count simply cannot.

The second thing I’m looking for is evidence of unmet demand. How far do residents drive to reach the retail and food-service options that should be available closer to home? Are there long lines at the limited options that do exist? Are there empty buildings that suggest failed attempts to serve a market that wasn’t ready, or successful businesses that suggest a market that is ready but underserved? These questions require eyes, not spreadsheets.

Third, I look at the infrastructure. This includes the condition of the roads, the quality of the intersections, and the utility infrastructure that will support development. A beautiful demographic profile in a market with inadequate infrastructure is a warning sign. A market with modest current demographics but serious infrastructure investment signals that the people making long-term bets on that corridor believe its best days are ahead.

The Conversations That Change Everything

Some of the most valuable site intelligence I have gathered over the years has come from conversations with people who would not appear on any analyst’s list of recommended contacts. Gas station attendants. Grocery store employees. Local police officers, as my team documented during our Oregon site hunt. The person running the only fast-food restaurant in a thirty-mile radius.

These are the people who know what residents are asking for. Who understands what the community needs but isn’t getting? Who can tell you, in five minutes of honest conversation, more about a market’s character and its unmet demand than any third-party research package?

I’m not romanticizing this. I’m reporting what works. The developers who are consistently early to the right markets are almost universally the ones who are physically present in those markets, talking to the people who live and work there, and building the local knowledge no report can substitute for.

A Practice Worth Building Into Your Process

For any broker or developer reading this who is evaluating a market you don’t know well: before you read the report, before you build the pro forma, before you engage a broker for comparable data, get in the car and go look.

Spend a day in the market. Drive every major arterial. Walk the available sites. Have lunch somewhere local. Talk to people. Let your direct experience inform your interpretation of the data rather than the other way around.

You will see things that change your analysis. You will miss opportunities the data flagged and discover opportunities the data missed. Over time, the discipline of ground-level market presence will become one of your most durable competitive advantages in a business where everyone has access to the same reports.

Read more from Akki Patel at https://akkipatel.com/

Akki Patel is the founder and CEO of LRE & Co., a commercial real estate development company operating across California, Idaho, Oregon, Nevada, Colorado, and Utah. He writes about entrepreneurship, development, and community impact at https://akkipatel.com/

 

CategoriesCommunity News & Blog

Habit Burger finally opens in Eureka, bringing drive-thru bites and 50-plus jobs

After what felt like an extra-long wait, Habit Burger has officially landed in Eureka—and it’s already serving up burgers and buzz.

The drive-thru restaurant opened its doors today on Fifth Street in Eureka, behind the old Starbucks. The menu includes a range of options, from burgers and chicken sandwiches to salads.

Beyond the food, the new location is also bringing new jobs to the area. “We want to be part of the Humboldt County community. We’ve hired over 50 folks from not just Eureka, but from the entire Humboldt community, from Rio Dell to Blue Lake and everywhere in between,” an operator for the new location said, Operator at Eureka’s Habit Burger, Alia Ganem.

The new location is open 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and 10 a.m. to 11 p.m. Friday and Saturday.

It is located at 1917 5th St, Eureka, CA 95501

CategoriesNews & Blog

Spring Construction Season: What Developers Need to Know About California’s 2026 Building Code Updates

If you’re breaking ground this spring, California’s regulatory landscape looks materially different from a year ago. The 2025 California Building Standards Code, codified in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, took effect on January 1, 2026, and applies to all permit applications submitted on or after that date. There is no grace period, no grandfather clause for projects still in design, and no waiting out the cycle: due to AB 130, this is the last major update to the code until at least 2031.

That six-year freeze makes understanding the 2026 requirements more urgent, not less. Whatever you build this spring will last for years. Here’s what developers with active commercial projects need to know before submitting for permits.

The Permit Date Is the Line That Matters

The most important thing to understand about the 2026 code is the trigger. Projects with permit applications submitted before January 1, 2026, may continue under the previous 2022 code cycle, provided the permit has not expired. Everything submitted after that date, including spring 2026 groundbreakings, must fully comply with the updated Title 24 standards. If your project is in design now, assume you’re building to the new code.

The Five Changes With the Biggest Commercial Impact

  1. Electrification: Bigger Scope, More Coordination Required

Electrification mandates are the most operationally disruptive change in the 2026 code. Requirements are embedded across multiple sections of Title 24 — Parts 2 (California Building Code), 6 (Energy Code), and 11 (CALGreen) — and they materially expand the electrical scope of work on virtually every commercial project.

For commercial kitchens, the new energy code introduces “electric-ready” infrastructure requirements, meaning new builds must be pre-wired to accommodate future all-electric appliances, even if gas equipment is installed at opening. Service sizing requirements have increased, load calculation constraints have tightened, and EV-ready and EV-capable infrastructure is now mandatory for commercial parking structures, with ratios based on occupancy type.

The practical implication is that electrical, mechanical, and framing trades now need to be coordinated earlier in the design process than most project teams are accustomed to. Compliance is no longer determined solely at the design stage; field verification, commissioning, and documentation, including HERS testing, are now required for sign-off.

  1. Solar + Battery Storage: No Longer Optional Together

New commercial buildings that require solar photovoltaic systems must now pair them with battery energy storage systems (BESS). This pairing requirement adds planning complexity around roof space, load calculations, and system design that wasn’t previously required. Developers who have pre-designed rooftop configurations without BESS integration may need to redesign before permit approval.

The California Energy Commission projects that, taken together, these energy code updates will generate an estimated $4.8 billion in energy savings over 30 years and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 4 million metric tons, equivalent to the annual energy consumption of more than half a million homes.

  1. Embodied Carbon: A New Requirement for Large Commercial Projects

California became the first state to regulate embodied carbon, the emissions produced during the manufacturing and assembly of building materials, directly in its building code. Starting in 2026, the CalGreen requirements apply to commercial buildings over 50,000 square feet, requiring developers to address embodied carbon through material reuse, life-cycle assessments, or low-carbon material choices.

For large-footprint commercial projects, office campuses, retail centers, and industrial facilities, this is a new design and procurement constraint that will affect material-sourcing timelines and potentially cost assumptions for steel, concrete, and glass. Budget for the assessment work early; it cannot be retrofitted late in the design process.

  1. A Standalone Wildfire Code — With Real Teeth

Previously, wildfire-resistant construction standards were scattered across three sections of the California Building Code. The 2026 update consolidates them into a single, standalone California Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Code, codified as Title 24, Part 7. The new WUI Code applies to approximately 4.5 million California properties in fire-prone areas and requires ignition-resistant exterior materials, ember-resistant vents, and compliance with defensible space requirements for all new construction and major renovations in designated zones.

For commercial developers building anywhere near WUI-designated territory, the standalone code means stricter oversight of materials, installation sequencing, and inspection, and less room for jurisdictional interpretation than the old dispersed standards allowed.

  1. Accessibility Upgrades Now Easier to Trigger

Updates to the California Existing Building Code have increased the likelihood that even modest renovation projects trigger broader accessibility compliance upgrades. Developers planning tenant improvements or partial renovations should budget for the possibility that their scope of work triggers accessibility requirements beyond the immediate work area. For commercial projects in older buildings, this warrants a code analysis before finalizing the construction documents.

New Contract Rules That Change Your Cash Flow Math

Two new laws that took effect on January 1, 2026, will affect how commercial construction contracts are structured and will apply regardless of project type.

SB 61 establishes a mandatory 5% retention cap for most private construction contracts. The cap applies across all subcontracting tiers and cannot be waived by contract. If your standard contract language has historically included 10% retention, that provision is no longer enforceable. Review and update all contract templates before spring procurement.

SB 440, the Private Works Change Order Fair Payment Act, establishes standardized statutory procedures for change-order disputes on large private projects, including defined timelines for claims involving delays, additional costs, and time extensions. The law sunsets in 2030 unless extended. During that period, documentation discipline and timely notice will be legally significant in dispute resolution.

What This Means for Spring Timelines

Developers with projects permitting this spring should pressure-test the following:

  • Design coordination: Has your electrical engineer been engaged early enough to address expanded service sizing, EV infrastructure, and BESS integration prior to permit submittal?
  • Roof planning: If your project requires solar, does the roof layout account for paired battery storage? Has the load capacity been evaluated?
  • Material procurement: For projects over 50,000 square feet, has embodied carbon been addressed in your material specifications?
  • WUI exposure: Has your site been evaluated using updated WUI zone designations?
  • Contract review: Have the retention clauses and change-order procedures been updated to comply with SB 61 and SB 440?

The 2026 code cycle is the most comprehensive update to California’s building standards in recent memory. With a six-year freeze now in place, it will be the standard your projects are measured against for the foreseeable future. Developers who treat code compliance as a late-stage checklist rather than an early design input will feel the consequences in permitting delays, redesigning costs, and project timelines. The spring groundbreaking window is still open, but the margin for error is smaller than it used to be.

 

CategoriesNews & Blog

Northern California vs. Northwest Nevada: A Developer’s Comparative Market Analysis

Two distinct markets. One portfolio. Here’s how LRE evaluates opportunity, regulatory friction, tenant demand, and returns across both regions.

At LRE & Co, strategic development isn’t just about where to build — it’s about understanding why each market behaves as it does. Our footprint across Northern California and Northwest Nevada gives us a unique vantage point on two of the West’s most dynamic industrial and commercial environments. They share a border but diverge sharply in regulatory velocity, tenant composition, and development scalability. Here’s a clear, updated look at both.

Development Opportunity: Land, Cost, and Room to Grow

Northern California, particularly the Sacramento Valley and surrounding infill submarkets, offers a robust pipeline of adaptive-reuse and redevelopment opportunities. Land is competitive and often constrained, yet developers gain access to a large consumer base, established logistics corridors, and proximity to Bay Area demand. Entitlements take time, but the reward is an asset in a liquid, supply-constrained market.

Northwest Nevada tells a different story, not the old one. While the region was once a lower-cost alternative, land prices in Reno-Sparks, TRIC, and other high-demand nodes now often match or exceed those in the Sacramento area. The real advantage is not cheaper land; it’s scale, speed, and predictability. Large, contiguous parcels remain more accessible, and projects can move from concept to construction with fewer delays.

Key realities:

  • Land pricing between the two regions is now comparable, depending on the submarket.
  • The cost of doing business, labor, construction, and impact fees, is also more similar than many assume.
  • Nevada’s edge comes from transaction velocity and development scalability, not discounts.

Regulatory Environment: The Friction Factor

California’s regulatory framework is well known; CEQA, prevailing wage requirements, and extended permitting timelines can add 12–24 months to a project. These hurdles increase soft costs and introduce entitlement risk, while also creating high barriers to entry. Once a project is approved, it benefits from long-term supply constraints that support occupancy and rent growth.

Northwest Nevada operates under a fundamentally different philosophy. No state income tax, streamlined permitting, and pro-development local governments make entitlement timelines significantly faster. Washoe and Storey counties routinely fast-track approvals for qualifying industrial and commercial projects. Even when land prices are similar to those in California, the reduction in regulatory friction materially improves project economics.

“The question isn’t which market is better, it’s which market aligns with your capital structure, your timeline, and your tenant relationships.”

Tenant Demand: Who’s Leasing and Why

Northern California’s tenant base is broad and resilient. E-commerce distribution, food and beverage processing, government agencies, industrial users, and life sciences all contribute to stable demand. UC Davis, state government employment, and proximity to the Bay Area’s innovation economy create a diversified and durable occupancy foundation.

Northwest Nevada has emerged as a magnet for large-format logistics, advanced manufacturing, and data infrastructure. Tesla, Google, Apple, and Switch anchor the region, drawing suppliers and logistics operators to the I-80 corridor. The tenant profile is more concentrated yet exceptionally strong, ideal for developers capable of delivering big-box or specialized industrial products.

ROI Potential: Running the Numbers

Return profiles differ meaningfully between the two regions — but not for the reasons they once did.

Northern California’s higher soft costs and longer entitlement timelines compress initial yields, with stabilized cap rates in key Sacramento submarkets typically ranging from mid-4% to low-6%. Yet the value-add thesis remains compelling: rent growth fundamentals are strong, supply is constrained, and long-term appreciation is supported by high barriers to entry.

Northwest Nevada often delivers higher risk-adjusted returns due to speed to market, lower entitlement risk, and long-term institutional leases. Even when land prices are comparable to those in California, the ability to deliver product faster and secure 10–20-year leases with major tenants enhances cash-flow stability. Nevada’s tax structure, including the absence of a state income tax, further improves after-tax returns for many investor profiles.

LRE’s Perspective

Both markets are essential to LRE & Co.’s development strategy, not because they are similar, but because their differences complement each other.

  • Northern California offers diversified tenant demand, long‑term appreciation, and supply‑limited fundamentals.
  • Northwest Nevada offers speed, scalability, tax advantages, and access to next‑generation industrial users reshaping the American supply chain.

A disciplined developer doesn’t choose between them. They allocate capital to the opportunity that best aligns with their risk tolerance, timeline, and expertise.

At LRE & Co, years of relationship-building, entitlement experience, and market intelligence across both regions enable us to act decisively when opportunities arise, and to deliver assets that perform across cycles.

CategoriesNews & Blog

Why the NNN Structure Must Change If Brands Want to Grow

The triple-net lease has long been the foundation of retail real estate. Brands commit to a location, developers build to suit, and the economics are meant to benefit everyone. But in 2026, that model is unraveling, and if brands and developers don’t adapt together, expansion plans will come to a halt.

The main issue is a timing mismatch that the traditional NNN structure was never meant to manage.

The Gap Between Lease Signing and Opening Day

Here’s the reality that brands often overlook: a lease may be signed today, but a new location might not open for two to three years. Entitlements take time, permits get delayed, and construction costs fluctuate. From the moment the ink hits the paper to when the first customer walks in, the world has often changed, sometimes quite significantly.

Many brands still negotiate NNN costs with a fixed mindset, trying to cap expenses at lease signing as if those numbers will stay the same through years of entitlement, permitting, and construction. That approach made sense in a more stable cost climate. Now, it causes a structural problem that could make the economics of new development unfeasible.

Developers Are Facing Real Cost Uncertainty

Most developers aren’t being difficult when they push back on hard NNN caps, they’re being transparent about conditions on the ground.

Insurance premiums have increased in many markets. Construction labor costs remain high and unpredictable. Material prices continue to fluctuate due to supply chain disruptions and tariff risks. When a developer agrees to build a project at a fixed cost, only to see expenses rise 20 to 30 percent before construction even starts, something has to give. Either the deal becomes unviable, or the developer walks away.

Neither outcome helps brands grow.

Rigid NNN Terms Are Slowing Expansion

When brands insist on fixed NNN caps that don’t consider the realities of development timelines, they unintentionally make themselves more difficult to build for. Developers have options. Capital flows toward deals that are financially sensible. If a brand’s lease terms don’t allow for cost recovery in a rising-expense environment, that brand drops to the bottom of the priority list.

The brands that are successfully executing aggressive growth strategies in 2026 are the ones willing to have a different conversation, one focused on partnership rather than protection. They are entering lease negotiations with an understanding that:

  • The lease signed today reflects conditions that will not exist at delivery
  • Developers absorbing all cost uncertainty will demand higher rents or decline the deal entirely
  • Flexibility in lease structure is not a concession; it’s an investment in their own expansion

Brands that refuse to adapt are seeing their site pipelines dwindle, not because good locations are unavailable, but because the deal structures don’t work for those who develop them.

What Flexible NNN Structures Actually Look Like

Flexibility doesn’t mean brands abandon cost controls. It means structuring leases in a way that acknowledges the realities of development timelines and cost fluctuations. Practical approaches include:

  • Index-linked NNN adjustments that tie expense caps to CPI or construction cost indices rather than fixed dollar amounts
  • Open-book development agreements where brands have full visibility into cost drivers and share in the risk of major variances
  • Defined NNN reset provisions at delivery that reflect actual stabilized operating costs, not underwriting assumptions made years earlier
  • Expense caps that apply only to controllable costs, not insurance or taxes, which are genuinely outside developer control

These structures shield brands from unlimited exposure while allowing developers enough flexibility to make the numbers work, which is essential for closing the deal.

Growth Requires Partnership, Not Just Protection

The brands that will succeed in the next decade of retail growth are those that treat real estate relationships as true partnerships. Developers openly discuss rising costs and market uncertainty, and that transparency actually indicates a healthy working relationship. The question is whether brands are willing to respond to that openness with flexibility.

A brand that insists on locking in NNN costs at signing, refuses to adjust for entitlement delays, and treats developers as cost centers rather than partners will find it increasingly difficult to achieve growth. Conversely, a brand that engages collaboratively, sharing information, establishing reasonable cost adjustment mechanisms, and viewing the developer’s economics as part of its own expansion strategy, will find developers eager to prioritize their projects.

The math is simple: if the deal doesn’t work for the developer, the location doesn’t get built. And if the location isn’t built, the brand doesn’t grow.

What This Means for Brands Planning Expansion

For any brand with a serious growth plan in 2026, the NNN discussion needs to begin earlier and delve deeper. Real estate teams should be asking not just what the NNN number is, but how it was underwritten, what assumptions are included, and how the structure holds up if entitlements take an extra 12 months or construction costs increase by 15 percent.

Brands that are successfully expanding are approaching this differently. They are:

  • Engaging developers earlier in the site selection process to understand true cost exposure before signing
  • Building schedule contingencies into their expansion models that account for entitlement and permitting timelines
  • Accepting reasonable NNN cost adjustment mechanisms in exchange for the developer’s commitment to deliver on the timeline
  • Treating NNN negotiations as a shared financial planning exercise rather than an adversarial cost battle

The Bottom Line

The NNN lease isn’t the issue. The problem is using a fixed structure in a constantly changing development environment and expecting it to yield the same results as a decade ago.

Entitlements take time. Permits get delayed. Costs fluctuate. Any brand aiming to grow in today’s environment must consider all of these factors, not by abandoning cost discipline, but by building the right kind of flexibility into its lease structures that makes the deal viable from the developer’s side.

Developers are generally willing to be transparent partners in this conversation. The brands that come prepared to engage with that mindset, to share risk wisely rather than avoid it completely, are the ones that will keep their pipelines moving.

In 2026, growth isn’t just a real estate strategy. It’s a partnership approach.

The brands that understand this will grow. Those that don’t will wonder why their pipeline has stalled.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

 

CategoriesNews & Blog

From Farm Town to Foodie Destination: How Quality Dining Options Transform Rural Economies

There is a moment in a rural community’s life that real estate developers learn to recognize. It doesn’t happen during a ribbon-cutting or groundbreaking, but months later, when a town that once drove forty miles for a sit-down meal starts drawing visitors from forty miles away instead. It’s the moment a food destination is born, and its economic impact extends far beyond the dining room.

At LRE & Co, we have spent decades working at the crossroads of commercial development and community growth. Nowhere is this intersection more meaningful, or more overlooked, than in rural and small-market communities, where the arrival of a well-known food brand doesn’t just add a restaurant; it redefines what a town can become.

The Signal a Brand Sends

When a nationally recognized restaurant brand chooses a rural market, it does something a local business often cannot: it provides external validation. A franchise decision is not made lightly. It results from thorough demographic analysis, traffic studies, and trade area modeling. When that process determines that a small town in rural Nevada or a growing agricultural community in the intermountain West is viable, the surrounding market takes notice.

Lenders see it. Competing retailers see it. Other restaurant groups see it. The presence of a well-known brand indicates that the market has crossed a threshold — meaning that population density, household income, and traffic volume have reached levels that support quality commercial investment. In communities long ignored by national chains, this signal can trigger a chain reaction of development that no amount of local advocacy alone could cause.

Jobs That Multiply Beyond the Counter

The direct employment a restaurant provides is the most obvious economic benefit, but it is rarely the most impactful. A QSR or casual dining place in a rural market generally employs between 25 and 50 workers, offering entry-level jobs, shift management positions, and, in the case of franchised operations, opportunities to start small businesses. For communities where the employment base has historically consisted of agriculture, government, and small retail, these jobs offer genuine diversification.

The more significant impact, however, is indirect. Restaurants stimulate demand for local suppliers, product vendors, linen services, and maintenance contractors. They also attract additional retail stores to nearby shopping centers. They generate foot traffic that spills over into neighboring businesses — the hardware store, the pharmacy, the local boutique — all of which benefit from people making a deliberate trip to a commercial district that once seemed like an afterthought.

Economists call this the multiplier effect: each dollar of direct restaurant sales creates more economic activity as wages are spent locally, supply chains get activated, and neighboring businesses attract more traffic. In rural areas with a limited economic base, the multiplier effect of a quality restaurant can be especially large because the initial economic activity is so small.

Property Values and the Halo Effect

The real estate effects of quality food development in rural areas are well-known and often underestimated by communities new to such changes. Property values within half a mile of a new restaurant tend to rise faster than the general market shortly after opening. The process is simple: better co-tenancy attracts more interest, increased traffic supports higher rents, and the market’s outlook shifts from stagnant to growing.

Residential values shift with amenities. When a community offers better dining options, it becomes more attractive to relocating families, remote workers, and retirees who previously favored towns with more developed amenities. Rural markets across the American West have observed this trend as broadband expansion and remote work flexibility make location choices more adaptable, and dining quality has become an important factor in where people decide to settle.

For landowners and existing commercial property owners in these markets, developing a food anchor is often the highest-return event in an asset’s lifetime. For developers like LRE & Co, it marks the start of a value-creation cycle that can support multiple development phases over the years.

Community Pride as an Economic Asset

The economic impact of developing quality dining options is tangible and measurable, but there’s an aspect that’s harder to quantify: community pride. In towns where dining options have mostly been limited to a gas station deli and a pizza delivery window, the opening of a sit-down restaurant with authentic ambiance is a significant event. It transforms how residents talk about their town, both to visitors and to themselves.

This matters economically because community identity influences investment behavior. Proud residents reinvest in their community by starting businesses, renovating storefronts, and advocating for more development instead of accepting the status quo. Local governments that see their towns attracting quality brands become more willing to approve infrastructure investments and zoning reforms that support further growth.

At LRE & Co, we’ve seen this pattern repeatedly in markets across Nevada and the broader West. A restaurant that seems like a simple business deal often sparks a years-long transformation in how a community views its potential and acts on it.

Bringing the Right Brands to Underserved Markets

The challenge for rural economic development isn’t figuring out which communities would benefit from better food options; almost all of them would. Instead, it’s about bridging the gap between national brands that need proven market data and communities that can’t provide those metrics without the development they’re trying to attract.

This is where seasoned commercial developers play a vital role. LRE & Co has spent over 20 years cultivating relationships with national tenants, franchise operators, and regional food concepts, enabling us to advocate effectively for markets that might otherwise be overlooked. We know how to present a rural Nevada trade area in a way that aligns with a franchise development team’s evaluation criteria, and how to structure a development that makes economic sense for both the operator and the community.

The shift from a farm town to a food destination doesn’t happen by chance. It occurs when the right developer introduces the right brand to the right location and recognizes that what they are creating is more than just a restaurant; it is the first chapter of a community’s new economic chapter.

CategoriesNews & Blog

The Recession-Resistant Tenant: Why C-Stores and QSRs Outperform in Economic Uncertainty

When the economy contracts, investors and developers both rush to reevaluate their portfolios. Cap rates expand, rent concessions appear, and vacancy rates increase across many asset types. But step into any convenience store or drive through any fast-food lane during a recession, and you’ll notice something striking: business as usual. The line at the drive-through remains just as long. The c-store coffee station stays just as busy. These aren’t lucky anomalies; they stem from deeply ingrained consumer habits that make convenience stores (c-stores) and quick-service restaurants (QSRs) among the most dependable anchor tenants in net-lease and retail real estate.

Trading Down, Not Cutting Out

The core idea behind c-store and QSR resilience is the “trade-down” effect. As economic pressure increases, consumers don’t stop spending; they shift their spending. A family that used to dine at a full-service restaurant three times a week now switches to a QSR. An office worker who once bought a $7 artisan coffee now chooses a $2 convenience-store cup. Spending continues; the location simply changes.

This pattern has consistently emerged across every major economic downturn over the past four decades. During the 2008-2009 financial crisis, QSR same-store sales outperformed those of casual dining by a significant margin, with brands like McDonald’s posting positive comparable sales growth at the height of the recession. The National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) reported similar countercyclical trends, as c-store fuel and in-store sales remained among the most stable categories in retail.

The Data Speaks: Consistency Through Every Cycle

The historical record for these two tenant categories is compelling. Consider the following benchmarks that outline their performance throughout economic cycles:

Occupancy stability: Net-lease properties anchored by investment-grade QSR and c-store operators have traditionally maintained occupancy rates above 98% even during recessions, significantly outperforming retail categories like apparel, electronics, and home furnishings.

Rent collection: During COVID-19, the most severe operational disruption in modern retail history, major QSR brands and c-store operators maintained rent payments at higher rates than almost any other retail category, thanks to drive-through infrastructure, essential-goods designations, and strong corporate balance sheets.

Lease structures: Long-term absolute NNN leases with corporate guarantees, common in both segments, shield landlords from fluctuations in operating expenses and offer income stability that institutional investors value in uncertain markets.

Why Location Economics Reinforce the Model

C-stores and QSRs are not only resilient during economic downturns; they are designed for location stability. Both types of outlets are positioned along busy corridors: interstate exits, suburban intersections, and commuter routes. These areas draw customers out of necessity and routine, not spontaneous impulse. Fuel stops, morning coffee, and a quick lunch, these habits persist regardless of broader economic conditions.

At LRE & Co, we assess anchor tenants not only on brand strength but also on the behavioral economics behind each visit. A convenience store that processes 1,500 fuel transactions daily has a markedly different risk profile than a specialty retailer making 200 discretionary purchases. Volume, frequency, and non-deferrable needs are the key factors of true tenant resilience.

Credit Quality and the Franchise Model

The resilience of these tenants during economic downturns is further strengthened by the franchise system that governs most QSR operations and the ongoing consolidation trend transforming the c-store industry. When a landlord leases to a 200-unit Burger King franchisee or a regional c-store operator with 80 locations, they gain from the financial stability of a large enterprise rather than a single-unit operator. National c-store operators — including Circle K, Wawa, Casey’s, and Couche-Tard — possess investment-grade or near-investment-grade credit profiles that offer substantial downside protection.

This credit depth is extremely important during economic downturns. When smaller retailers face liquidity issues, large QSR and c-store operators have the financial strength to meet lease obligations, keep operations running, and even speed up expansion — further confirming site choice and the strength of the local trade area.

What This Means for the Investor

For investors seeking reliable yield in a rate-volatile environment, c-store and QSR net-lease properties offer a rare combination: income stability, rent-increase provisions, and credit backing. Cap rates for top-tier QSR net-lease assets have typically compressed during periods of economic uncertainty as capital shifts away from higher-risk retail toward essential-use tenants, meaning that owning these assets before a downturn allows investors to benefit both operationally and through asset appreciation.

As we examine the current macroeconomic landscape, with elevated interest rates, softening consumer sentiment, and tightening credit conditions, the argument for c-stores and QSRs as anchor tenants is more than just convincing. It is backed by history. These tenants have withstood every economic shock of the past 40 years and have come out with occupancy preserved, rents paid, and store counts growing. https://lrecompanies.com/

CategoriesNews & Blog

Tenant Mix Strategy: Creating Synergy Between Retail, Food Service, and Healthcare

Walk through a thriving neighborhood center, and you notice something often overlooked: people move between tenants. The patient who just finished a medical appointment stops for lunch. The family that came in for groceries grabs coffee on the way out. The lunch crowd from the QSR pad site browses the nearby retail stores on a slow afternoon. None of this happens by chance.

Tenant mix strategy is one of the most important decisions a developer makes and one of the most undervalued. The right blend of retail, food service, and healthcare tenants doesn’t just fill space. It creates a community where each use enhances the others, producing consistent, multi-use traffic that sustains a center through economic ups and downs and encourages tenants to renew their leases.

At LRE & Co, tenant mix is a fundamental part of how we evaluate, design, and lease every project. Here’s how we approach creating synergy among these three use categories, and why it matters more than ever.

Why Synergy Is the Right Framework

The traditional way of leasing a retail center was mostly additive: fill the available spaces with the best tenants you can attract, focus on creditworthiness and rental prices, and let the market handle the rest. That approach worked well enough when retail foot traffic was almost guaranteed by population density and limited competition.

That era is behind us. E-commerce has permanently shifted some retail spending online, and the tenants thriving in physical retail today are those offering something that can’t be reproduced on a screen: convenience, immediacy, experience, and necessity. Healthcare remains unaffected by e-commerce competition. Food service has adapted to convenience with drive-thrus, mobile ordering, and delivery. The retail categories excelling are those centered on services, health, and daily needs.

The insight that follows is simple: these three use categories, retail, food service, and healthcare, share a customer base and boost each other’s traffic when carefully combined. The goal isn’t just about co-tenancy; it’s about true synergy, where the whole outperforms the sum of its parts.

Healthcare as the Anchor of the Modern Center

Healthcare as a retail center anchor marks one of the most important shifts in commercial real estate over the last decade. Medical tenants, urgent care clinics, dental practices, physical therapy, optical, behavioral health, and specialty outpatient facilities generate steady, appointment-driven traffic that remains unaffected by consumer sentiment or seasonal trends.

A well-located urgent care or dental practice generates multiple visits per day from a broad cross-section of the community. Those patients arrive with time to fill, before appointments, after appointments, during wait times, and a retail and food service environment that captures that dwell time converts passive traffic into active spending.

Healthcare tenants also bring a specific demographic profile that is highly valuable for co-tenants: households with insurance, regular income, and a demonstrated willingness to invest in their wellbeing. These are the customers that food service and retail tenants most want to reach. Placing a quality fast-casual restaurant adjacent to a medical office building isn’t just convenient; it’s a deliberate strategy to capture a valuable customer segment.

Food Service as the Traffic Engine

Food service has always attracted traffic to retail centers, but the way it does so has evolved. Today’s top-performing food tenants are those with the flexibility to serve multiple dayparts: breakfast, lunch, dinner, and increasingly late-night hours, while providing the convenience features modern consumers demand, such as drive-thrus, mobile ordering, and quick service.

In a well-designed mixed-use center, food service is the main driver of traffic, keeping the property active throughout the day. A QSR pad site attracts morning traffic from commuters and lunchtime crowds from nearby workers. A fast-casual restaurant appeals to families for dinner. A coffee shop attracts early morning and mid-afternoon visitors. Together, these create a traffic pattern that benefits all tenants in the center, including healthcare and retail.

The key for developers is ensuring that food service tenants are positioned to serve the widest possible customer base, including residents, employees, and patients from healthcare uses, while maintaining a physical layout that encourages cross-shopping rather than creating isolated experiences.

Retail That Completes the Ecosystem

The retail component of a synergistic tenant mix has a specific purpose: it captures the discretionary spending of customers who come mainly for food or healthcare and turns their visit into a broader engagement with the center. The retail categories best suited for this role are those related to health, convenience, and daily needs, pharmacy, optical, fitness, personal care, and specialty health and wellness.

CVS and similar pharmacy models serve as a typical example. They operate at the crossroads of healthcare, retail, and convenience, attracting daily traffic from prescription pickups while also selling a wide range of consumer goods. Optical, dental, and vision centers also blur the line between healthcare services and retail products. Fitness studios and wellness centers appeal to a health-conscious demographic that significantly overlaps with the patient populations served by medical tenants.

What doesn’t work as well in these mixed-use ecosystems is destination retail that requires significant consumer intent to visit, such as furniture, specialty apparel, and electronics. These categories compete for attention rather than complement the primary traffic drivers, and they tend to create friction in the leasing process without contributing proportionate value to the overall tenant mix.

Design Follows Strategy

A tenant mix strategy only achieves its intended synergies if the center’s physical design supports them. This involves positioning healthcare and food service tenants near shared parking, creating pedestrian pathways that naturally guide patients and diners past retail storefronts, and ensuring visibility and access from the main arterial road to communicate the center’s full range of offerings to passing traffic.

At LRE & Co, we prioritize the tenant-mix thesis before finalizing the site design. Understanding which uses need to be adjacent, which require direct drive-thru access, and which benefit from interior pedestrian exposure influences everything from parking ratios to building orientation and the placement of pad sites. The design supports the strategy, not the other way around.

The Long-Term Performance Case

Centers that combine retail, food service, and healthcare consistently outperform isolated or poorly integrated options on the key metrics that matter most to investors: occupancy rates, lease renewal rates, rental rate growth, and cap rate compression at sale. The reason is simple: tenants in high-synergy environments perform better, and tenants who perform well are more likely to renew leases, expand their space, and become long-term partners rather than short-term occupants.

In the markets where LRE & Co operates across California, Idaho, Oregon, Nevada, Colorado, and Utah, the centers that have maintained value most reliably during economic fluctuations are those with genuine tenant synergy. When one use category faces challenges, the others provide stability. When all three perform well, the combined effect on property performance is substantial.

A tenant mix strategy ultimately focuses on creating a space that fully serves the community so residents view it as a regular destination, not just for one errand, but for multiple needs. Achieving a high level of integration between retail, food service, and healthcare distinguishes a good center from a great one, and this is the standard LRE & Co applies to every project we develop. https://lrecompanies.com/

Get in touch

phone

(415) 491 – 1500

4302 Redwood Hwy Suite 200

San Rafael, CA 94903

email

info@lrecompanies.com

Get in touch

phone

(415) 491 – 1500

4302 Redwood Hwy Suite 200

San Rafael, CA 94903

email

info@lrecompanies.com

about us

The LRE & Co is a family organization that has been in real estate development, construction and the food and beverage businesses since 1999. It has been present in major markets throughout northern California and northwest Nevada.

Newsletter

Get latest news & update

© 1999 – lrecompanies.com. All rights reserved.